<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cars as trolleys?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outsidetheherd.com/2009/01/29/cars-as-trolleys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outsidetheherd.com/2009/01/29/cars-as-trolleys/</link>
	<description>Trendspotting innovations and disruptions from an outsider&#039;s perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Bryan</title>
		<link>http://outsidetheherd.com/2009/01/29/cars-as-trolleys/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsidetheherd.com/?p=119#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of problems here, Ed.  First, kilowatts per hour is clearly wrong in this context -- maybe they meant kilowatts for the whole experiment?  This common error makes a big difference when considering the physics, or the economics!  I have to say, though, that having us drive on crystals is creatively New-Age-y. Maybe the next-gen road can have pyramids, too?

Second, taking power from self-propelled vehicles is a kind of hidden taxation or toll, except that it&#039;s only indirectly money.  Consider how much harder it is to walk on beach sand than sidewalk, or recall how hard it is to pedal your tricycle on the carpet, because a fraction of your transportation power is sucked away by the &quot;road&quot;.  I haven&#039;t done the math quantitatively, but multiplying the energy inefficiencies of the vehicles, the crystals, and the necessary energy conversion circuitry, I suspect everyone would be better off if the road charged an overt toll and purchased electricity from the grid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of problems here, Ed.  First, kilowatts per hour is clearly wrong in this context &#8212; maybe they meant kilowatts for the whole experiment?  This common error makes a big difference when considering the physics, or the economics!  I have to say, though, that having us drive on crystals is creatively New-Age-y. Maybe the next-gen road can have pyramids, too?</p>
<p>Second, taking power from self-propelled vehicles is a kind of hidden taxation or toll, except that it&#8217;s only indirectly money.  Consider how much harder it is to walk on beach sand than sidewalk, or recall how hard it is to pedal your tricycle on the carpet, because a fraction of your transportation power is sucked away by the &#8220;road&#8221;.  I haven&#8217;t done the math quantitatively, but multiplying the energy inefficiencies of the vehicles, the crystals, and the necessary energy conversion circuitry, I suspect everyone would be better off if the road charged an overt toll and purchased electricity from the grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

